- #Microsoft edge logo ugly software
- #Microsoft edge logo ugly license
- #Microsoft edge logo ugly plus
- #Microsoft edge logo ugly windows
Under “ Pause on this site” click “ Always”.Click the AdBlock icon in the browser extension area in the upper right-hand corner.
#Microsoft edge logo ugly plus
Magazine, one of JavaWorld's sister publications.Adblock Adblock Plus Adblocker Ultimate Ghostery uBlock Origin Others Elizabeth Heichler is a correspondent for the IDG News Service,Ī JavaWorld affiliate.
And Java is threatened because one group refuses to be compliant."Īnd while Sun can exercise its legal rights over the use of the Java name, it can do little to stop Microsoft from implementing a "clean room" version of the Java virtual machine, says Morgenthal.
#Microsoft edge logo ugly windows
By having a non-compliant JVM on Windows, he speculates, Microsoft hopes "to show the power of BASIC and the Windows platform. "Why would Microsoft go and do that unless they were purposely antagonizing Sun into a lawsuit?" According to Morgenthal, Microsoft's actions undermine Java's Achilles' heel: interoperability. "This is a pretty blatant move by Microsoft to change the return items from method calls," he says. Morgenthal of NC.Focus, Microsoft's implementation is deliberately non-compliant.
#Microsoft edge logo ugly software
While Microsoft has responded to the popularity of Java by licensing the software from Sun for inclusion into its Internet Explorer 4.0 browser, its implementation of Java has apparently displeased Sun by tying it too closely to the Windows operating system.īut according to one analyst, J.P. Java, both a programming language and a platform-independent operating environment, is seen by many computer industry observers as a threat to Microsoft Windows's stranglehold on the desktop operating system environment. Sun accuses Microsoft of embarking on "a deliberate course of conduct in an attempt to fragment the standardized application programming environment established by the Java technology, to break the cross-platform compatibility of the Java programming environment, and to implement the Java technology in a manner calculated to cause software developers to create programs that will operate only on platforms that use defendant Microsoft's Win32-based operating systems and no other systems platform or browser." The complaint also charges Microsoft with trademark infringement, false advertising, breach of contract, unfair competition, interference with prospective economic advantage, and inducing breach of contract. According to him, in some cases "you have to use the extended version of the interface to get the answer." This means that applications would run differently on IE 4.0 than from a browser that fully supported JDK 1.1. Baratz says that, for example, the interface method used to query and find what color is painted on a computer's screen has been altered by Microsoft. According to Sun, approximately 50 methods and 50 fields have been added to the Java APIs within things like the AWT (abstract windowing toolkit) package and I/O package. The company claims that Microsoft has added methods and fields to the Java classes on the Java hierarchy. Today, Sun announced that Microsoft has failed those compatibility tests of its IE 4.0 browser and Software Development Kit for Java.
#Microsoft edge logo ugly license
Since the final version of IE 4.0 was made available last week, Sun claims it has run the product through Java compatibility tests and has previously said that some changes to the API (application programming interface) could violate license agreements. Reading from a prepared statement, a Microsoft spokesperson today called Sun's claims "outrageous," adding that "Microsoft has delivered the most compatible implementation of Java on the marketplace and is well within the terms of our agreement." The spokesperson declined to comment on Sun's specific allegations, saying, "Since this is a matter now in active litigation, we will not be speaking about the details of the case in the press." Sun: Microsoft added methods and fields to Java classes But he says that the most obvious non-compliant vendor, Netscape Communications Corp., is not being sued because "Netscape has never claimed to be shipping a complete version of JDK 1.1," and "Netscape is committed to delivering a fully compatible version of JDK 1.1 in their next major release." "Our goal is to get Microsoft back into compliance," he claims.īaratz says that only four vendors are presently shipping JDK 1.1-compliant products: Sun, Borland, Symantec, and IBM. "By not shipping the complete JDK (Java Development Kit) in the final version of Internet Explorer (IE) 4.0, Microsoft has deliberately breached its contractual obligation," says Alan Baratz, JavaSoft division president, in a conference call today.
0 kommentar(er)
